| Assessment Rubric Areas to be Graded | Online Databases Project Rubric | ||
| Excellent | Adequate | Insufficient | |
| 90% – 100% | 70% – 89% | 0% – 69% | |
| Database Design 20 points | The student has provided a well laid out ER diagram. The physical design of the database is accurate, and clearly implements the logical design. Student has gone beyond the basic requirements. | Almost all of the requirements of the Logical design has been provided by the student and implemented in the physical design. | There are several inaccuracies in the logical design provided by the student or many of the requirements of the database design were not implemented in the physical design. |
| PHP Application 35 points | The CRUD application works well, is error free, well documented and extremely efficient. Student has gone beyond the basic requirements. | Student has met most of the basic requirements but the CRUD application is displaying some errors or lacking in some functionality. | The CRUD application is producing incorrect results. Student has not met the basic requirements. |
| Web Design and Content 15 points | Web site effectively communicates desired message to the audience. The author has done an exceptional job of making the content of the website interesting. The content layout is exceptional and user friendly. Student has gone beyond the basic requirements. | Web site does an adequate job communicating message to the audience. The content layout is adequate and the site is mostly user friendly. | Content poorly written and does not communicate information well. The layout needs to be more user friendly. |
| Responsive 10 points | Web site effectively responds to different devices and screen sizes. | Web site does an adequate job of responding to different devices and screen sizes. | Web site has issues responding to different devices and screen sizes. |
| CSS and HTML 10 points | Excellent use of CSS and HTML easy to follow for next Web designer. | Adequate use of CSS and HTML fairly easy to follow. Could be improved. | Poor or no use of CSS; HTML difficult to follow and poorly organized. |
| Navigation 10 points | Excellent use of navigational tools. All hyperlinks for navigating work. | Navigational tools could be improved, but adequate. | Poor use of navigational tools. No consideration for navigating around site. |